We build automations that take repetitive admin off your team. Documents filled from records you already hold, data moved between systems that don't talk, enquiries sorted before anyone opens them. We agree the goal with you before we start, and two weeks in, if it isn't doing that, we both walk away and nobody owes anything.
What we commit to, in writing
4×
faster client onboarding
20+
hrs a week back across your team
10 min
maximum spend on setting up a new client
90%
reduction in manual reporting
Targets are agreed with you before a build starts and written into the engagement. Miss them and you are refunded.
Your firm has work that exists only because two of your systems don't talk to each other. Someone opens a record, reads a number, and types it somewhere else. It isn't skilled work, it isn't billable, and it's the first thing that gets pushed into evenings when your week gets busy.
That work doesn't shrink on its own. It grows with your client list, and the usual answer is hiring someone to absorb it. We don't sell you new software instead. We change the workflow so the job stops reaching a person at all.
Book a free time auditWhat the research says
39%
of Australian small businesses spend more than six hours every week navigating red tape.
Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry42%
say compliance is having a negative impact on how the business operates.
ACCI, 2025 Business Conditions Report40%
spend more time stuck in the books than growing the business.
Dext, Built for Bigger Things, Censuswide, June 202531%
of financial management at the average Australian small business is still done by hand.
Dext, Built for Bigger Things, Censuswide, June 2025ACCI, 2025. Dext, Built for Bigger Things, Censuswide, 500 Australian businesses, June 2025. These describe Australian small business generally, not any one industry, and not your firm.
Most of what we build falls into one of these. If your version of the job isn't on the list it usually still fits, because the underlying problem is the same. Information you already hold is being moved by hand.
We agree the goal
Before anything gets built we write the task down with you, how long it takes now, and what finished looks like. If we can't agree on that, we'd rather not start.
We build it
You keep working. We don't need your team sitting in workshops, and we don't replace software you already pay for.
You decide if it worked
Two weeks in you tell us whether it does the thing we agreed. If it doesn't, we both walk away and nobody owes anything.
Forms, applications, engagement letters and reports that get assembled by hand from data already sitting in your CRM or your spreadsheets. The build pulls the record, fills the document, and files it where it belongs.
The job that exists only because two tools don't talk. Timesheets into accounting, form submissions into practice management, spreadsheets into anything. Typed once, or not at all.
Emails, forms and messages read and routed before anyone on your team opens them. Confirmations filed, real questions flagged, and nothing sitting unseen because whoever handles it was out that day.
Ads, after hours capture, follow up and reviews built as one system. Built before you pay, then charged per qualified lead up to a cap we agree first.
First we work out what the task costs you now, in hours a week and who on your team is spending them. We then quote under what that time is worth to you. It is why we agree the goal before we quote anything, and why there is no rate card. Without your numbers, a price is just a guess.
Illustration only, not a client result
A task that takes
4 hrs / week
Should take
minutes / week
Your version of this gets measured on the call, using your hours and your people. There's no rate card, because the number only means anything sitting next to what the task costs you today.
Two weeks in, if it isn't doing what we agreed, we both walk away and nobody owes anything.
We measure before we price
How long the task takes your team now, how often it happens, and who does it. Your numbers, not a benchmark we brought with us.
The quote sits under the value
If a build would cost you more than the time it gives back, there's no reason to do it, and we'll tell you rather than sell it.
Two weeks to decide
The walk-away runs both ways. It caps your risk, and it stops us sinking months into something that was never going to work.
The terms, in full
$0
upfront. No deposit, no retainer, nothing changes hands before the build does what we agreed.
2
weeks to decide. If it isn't working by then, we both walk away and nobody owes anything.
1
goal, written down before anything gets built, so neither of us can move the target afterwards.
0
lock-in. It runs on your accounts and your logins. If we stop, it keeps working.
The work we've finished belongs to clients who haven't agreed to be named. When that changes it goes here with real numbers attached, not adjectives.
You don't have to take our word for anything. You find out in two weeks, at no cost, which is a faster answer than reading somebody else's case study.
Nothing here is theoretical. You watch the build handle your own data, on your own systems, and then decide whether it was worth it.
Including what we've built, what went wrong on it, and how long it actually took. We'd rather answer that honestly than show you a wall of logos.
Tell us the task your team repeats most. On the call we work out how long it actually takes, whether it's worth automating at all, and roughly what a build would involve. If the answer is that it isn't worth it, that's a perfectly good outcome and you've lost half an hour.
A straight read on whether the task is worth automating
A rough scope of what the build involves and how long it takes
No proposal document, and no follow-up sequence afterwards